- W-2 vs 1099 vs corp-to-corp
- The three ways a worker gets paid on an assignment. W-2: the staffing firm is the employer, withholds taxes and carries workers' comp and unemployment. 1099: the worker is an independent contractor and carries all of it. Corp-to-corp: the agency contracts with the worker's own entity. Only the facts of the relationship decide which is lawful — a signed agreement calling someone a contractor does not make them one.
- Right to control (IRS common-law test)
- The IRS common-law test asks who has the right to direct and control the work, weighing behavioral control (instructions, training), financial control (investment, unreimbursed expenses, opportunity for profit or loss, availability to the market) and the type of relationship (contracts, benefits, permanency, whether the work is a key business activity). The right to control matters even when it is never exercised.
- DOL independent contractor rule (FLSA economic reality)
- The Wage and Hour Division's regulation for when a worker is an employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act, applying a multi-factor economic-reality analysis. The standard has swung between administrations — a 2021 rule, a 2024 replacement, and a February 2026 proposal to rescind the 2024 analysis and return to the 2021 approach — so the safe operating posture is to document the underlying facts, which no rule change alters.
- Texas Workforce Commission employment status
- For Texas unemployment tax and wage-claim purposes, TWC applies its own common-law and 20-factor direction-and-control analysis, independent of the IRS and DOL. A worker can be a contractor for one agency's purposes and an employee for another's. TWC status determinations are what drive an agency's state unemployment tax account and its exposure on wage claims.
- Joint employer and the NLRB standard
- Two entities are joint employers when both control essential terms and conditions of employment — wages, hours, scheduling, supervision, discipline, hiring and firing. The NLRB's 2023 expansion (which would have counted reserved and indirect control) was vacated by a federal court in March 2024 and formally withdrawn in February 2026, leaving the narrower 2020 standard requiring substantial direct and immediate control.
- Co-employment risk
- In staffing, co-employment is normal, not a defect — the agency and the client each hold part of the employer role. Risk arises when the client's conduct blurs the line: putting temps in the client's HR system, running the client's discipline process, promising raises, or treating temps as indistinguishable from employees for benefits eligibility. Contract language and consistent practice are the controls.
- PEO vs ASO vs staffing agency
- A staffing agency recruits and supplies workers it employs. A professional employer organization co-employs a client's own existing workforce under a client service agreement, handling payroll, benefits and comp. An administrative services organization does the same administrative work without co-employment — the client remains the sole employer of record.
- Certified PEO (CPEO)
- An IRS designation under which a PEO is solely liable for federal employment taxes on wages it pays, so the client is not exposed if the PEO fails to remit. Certification requires bonding, independent financial review and ongoing reporting. It is the main structural distinction a buyer should ask about when comparing PEOs.
- Payrolling and employer of record
- The client has already found the worker and asks the agency only to employ and pay them. The agency is the employer of record — it runs payroll, withholds, insures and carries the comp and unemployment exposure — with no recruiting. Priced at a lower markup than recruited placements because the sourcing cost is zero, but the liability is identical.
- Workers' compensation class codes and the experience modifier
- Every job is assigned a classification code carrying its own rate per $100 of payroll; a clerical code and a roofing code differ by an order of magnitude. The experience modification rate then multiplies that premium up or down based on the firm's own claims history versus its class average. Both belong in the bill rate — an agency that quotes a single markup across all class codes is losing money on the dangerous ones.
- Texas non-subscriber status
- Texas is the state where private employers may decline to carry workers' compensation insurance. Non-subscribers give up the exclusive-remedy protection and can be sued directly for negligence, without the usual common-law defenses. For a staffing firm this is a live decision, and clients routinely require subscriber status and a certificate of insurance before the first shift.
- OSHA multi-employer worksite doctrine and the host/agency shared duty
- OSHA can cite more than one employer on a site — the one that created the hazard, the one that controls the site, the one whose employees are exposed, and the one able to correct it. Under OSHA's temporary worker guidance the host employer and the staffing agency share the duty for a temp's safety: the host generally provides site-specific hazard training and controls the conditions, the agency provides general awareness training and must not place a worker into a hazard it knows about.
- Temporary worker safety training
- The practical division of labor: the agency trains on general workplace safety, right-to-know, injury reporting and the right to refuse unsafe work; the host trains on the actual machines, chemicals, lockout/tagout, PPE and emergency procedures at that site. The agency should walk the site before placing anyone and document what it saw, because 'we didn't know' is not a defense.
- I-9 and E-Verify
- As the employer of record the staffing firm — not the client — completes Form I-9 and retains it, verifying identity and work authorization within the statutory deadlines. E-Verify is the federal electronic check against government records; it is voluntary federally but mandatory for Texas state agencies and for many federal contractors, and increasingly required by client contract.
- Ban-the-box and fair-chance hiring
- Laws and ordinances that bar asking about criminal history on an initial application or before a conditional offer, and that require individualized assessment of the offense's relationship to the job. Coverage varies by state and city and by public versus private employer, so a multi-state agency's application must be built to the strictest jurisdiction it recruits in.
- Background check and FCRA adverse action
- A background check run through a consumer reporting agency is a consumer report under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. That triggers a standalone written disclosure, separate authorization, and — if the report will cost the applicant the job — a pre-adverse action notice with a copy of the report and the summary of rights, a reasonable waiting period to dispute, and then a final adverse action notice. Skipping the two-step sequence is one of the most commonly litigated errors in staffing.
- Drug testing policy
- What is tested, when (pre-placement, random, reasonable suspicion, post-accident), by what method, and under whose policy — the agency's or the client's. Complications include DOT-regulated roles with their own mandatory program, state marijuana laws that conflict with client requirements, and post-accident testing practices that can chill injury reporting.
- Wage and hour, overtime and the FLSA exemption tests
- Non-exempt workers must receive overtime at one and a half times the regular rate above 40 hours in a workweek. Exemption requires meeting both a salary basis and threshold and a duties test (executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, computer). The regular rate is not the base rate — it must absorb shift differentials, non-discretionary bonuses and multiple pay rates in the same week.
- Rest and meal breaks
- Federal law does not require meal or rest breaks, but if a short break of roughly 20 minutes or less is given it must be paid, and a bona fide unpaid meal period must be genuinely duty-free. Several states impose their own break mandates; Texas does not, so on Texas assignments the client's own policy controls and the agency's timekeeping must match how breaks are actually taken.
- Paid sick leave ordinances and Texas preemption
- Austin, San Antonio and Dallas each passed municipal paid-sick-leave ordinances that were blocked in court, and Texas subsequently enacted broad state preemption of local employment mandates. The practical result is that a Texas staffing firm has no statewide or citywide sick-leave obligation — but multi-state agencies and clients with national policies frequently apply one anyway by contract.
- Pay transparency
- A growing set of state and city laws requiring a good-faith pay range in job postings, and in some places disclosure on request or a bar on asking salary history. It reaches staffing firms directly, since the posting is usually the agency's. Texas has no statewide requirement, but a national job board posting can still trigger another state's rule.
- EEO-1 reporting
- The annual EEOC filing of workforce demographics by job category, race/ethnicity and sex, required of private employers with 100 or more employees and of covered federal contractors. Staffing firms count their temporary workers, which pushes many agencies over the threshold far earlier than their internal headcount would suggest.
- Bill rate and pay rate
- The pay rate is what the worker earns per hour. The bill rate is what the client is invoiced per hour. Everything the agency must cover — employment taxes, workers' compensation, unemployment, benefits, recruiting, branch overhead and profit — lives in the difference between the two.
- Markup and gross margin
- Markup is expressed against pay rate (bill rate divided by pay rate, minus one). Gross margin is expressed against bill rate (gross profit divided by bill rate). They describe the same dollar spread from opposite ends and are routinely confused in negotiation, always in the buyer's favor. Quote and compare in one convention and state which one.
- Spread
- The raw dollar difference between bill rate and pay rate for an hour worked, before burden is subtracted. Useful as a quick desk-level check, misleading as a profitability measure, because two orders with identical spread can have very different burden depending on class code, overtime and benefit eligibility.
- Burden
- The employer-side cost of employing the worker beyond wages: the employer share of FICA, federal unemployment tax (FUTA) and state unemployment tax (SUTA), workers' compensation premium at the applicable class code, any benefits or ACA coverage, and paid time off where offered. Burden varies by state, by class code and by the agency's own unemployment experience rate.
- Fully-burdened cost
- Pay rate plus all burden — the true hourly cost of the worker to the agency before any overhead or profit. The number a bill rate must clear. Agencies that price off pay rate alone discover the gap only when the workers' comp audit or the unemployment rate notice arrives.
- Conversion fee and fee schedule
- What the client owes to hire a temporary worker onto its own payroll. Usually either a flat fee, a percentage of the worker's first-year salary, or a declining schedule under which the fee drops with each month or each hundred hours the worker stays on assignment and reaches zero after a set period. The schedule is the single most negotiated clause in a temp-to-hire agreement.
- Direct hire fee
- A one-time placement fee for a permanent hire the agency recruits but never employs, typically a percentage of first-year compensation, billed on start date. No burden, no payroll and no ongoing revenue — the opposite cash profile from a temporary assignment, which is why some agencies treat it as a separate desk.
- Buyout
- A negotiated payment that ends the conversion obligation early, letting the client hire a worker before the fee schedule has run down. Also used for the reverse problem — a client that quietly hired a worker off assignment and now settles rather than litigate the contract.
- Guarantee period
- The window after a direct-hire placement or a conversion during which the agency will replace the worker at no charge, or refund on a sliding scale, if the placement fails. Typically 30 to 90 days. The fine print matters: whether a replacement or a refund, whether it survives a layoff, and whether the client must have paid the invoice on time to invoke it.
- MSP and VMS
- A managed service provider runs a client's entire contingent workforce program — supplier selection, rate governance, compliance and consolidated invoicing. A vendor management system is the software that distributes requisitions to approved suppliers, tracks submittals and captures time. Together they turn a relationship sale into a competitive rate-card process.
- Supplier tier
- The position an agency holds in a managed program. Tier-one suppliers see requisitions first and hold a release window; lower tiers see the same order minutes or hours later, when the good candidates are already submitted. Tier placement, not recruiting skill, often determines fill share inside a VMS.
- VMS fee
- The percentage the VMS or MSP takes, usually deducted from the supplier's bill rate rather than added to the client's cost. It comes straight out of gross margin, so a rate card that looks acceptable at first glance can be unworkable once the program fee, payment terms and any early-payment discount are applied.
- Statement of work vs staff augmentation
- Staff augmentation supplies hours: the client directs the work and pays per hour. A statement of work buys a defined deliverable at a fixed price or milestone schedule, with the supplier directing its own workers. The distinction changes who supervises, who bears performance risk, and how the engagement is classified — which is exactly why some clients relabel augmentation as SOW to route around a contingent-labor policy.
- Fill rate
- The share of received job orders the agency actually fills, and the honest measure of whether a desk is serving its clients. Read alongside how many orders were declined up front, since a branch can protect its fill rate simply by refusing hard orders.
- Time to fill and order-to-fill lead time
- Time to fill measures the interval from a job order being received to a worker accepting. Order-to-fill lead time is the operational version of the same question from the client's side — how much notice the agency needs to cover a shift. In light industrial these are measured in hours; in clerical and professional placement, in days or weeks.
- Submittal-to-interview ratio
- How many candidates the agency submits per interview granted. A poor ratio means the desk is not reading the order correctly, or is spraying candidates to look busy. Tracked alongside interview-to-offer and offer-to-start to locate exactly where a requisition is stalling.
- Redeployment rate
- The share of workers finishing an assignment who are placed onto a new one rather than lost. The cheapest recruiting an agency can do, since the worker is already onboarded, screened and known. A branch with a low redeployment rate is paying to re-recruit the same labor pool over and over.
- Assignment length
- How long a worker stays on one assignment. Some clients impose tenure limits — a hard cap after which a temp must be converted or rolled off — originally adopted to limit benefits-eligibility and co-employment exposure. Average length varies sharply by segment, with clerical and professional assignments running far longer than light-industrial ones.
- Turnover and attrition
- The rate at which assigned workers leave, split into first-day fall-off, week-one, and post-week-four attrition because the causes and the fixes are entirely different. Early attrition usually points to a mismatch between what the recruiter described and what the site actually is.
- No-show rate
- The share of confirmed workers who do not appear for a shift. The defining operational metric of light-industrial staffing and the reason branches over-recruit, confirm the night before and keep a standby list. Common drivers are transportation, shift timing, pay frequency and a competing same-day offer from an app.
- Headcount vs hours billed
- Headcount counts bodies on assignment; hours billed counts revenue. They diverge whenever hours per worker shift — overtime cuts, a client moving from ten-hour to eight-hour shifts, or a seasonal ramp of part-week workers. Revenue forecasts built on headcount alone miss the turn.
- DSO and payroll funding
- Days sales outstanding measures how long a client takes to pay. Because payroll is weekly and terms are commonly net 30 to net 60, a growing agency finances the gap out of its own working capital. Payroll funding is a facility that advances against approved invoices specifically to cover it.
- Invoice factoring
- Selling accounts receivable to a third party at a discount for immediate cash, sometimes bundled with credit checking and collections. Recourse factoring leaves the agency liable if the client never pays; non-recourse shifts that risk for a higher fee. Expensive money, and often the only money available to a young agency growing faster than it collects.
- Credit risk on client receivables
- The agency pays its workers whether or not the client pays the invoice, so every account is an unsecured extension of credit. Controls include credit checks before the first order, credit limits per account, watching concentration (one client that is a large share of revenue), stopping service on aged balances, and reading a client's own payment behaviour as an early distress signal.